14 October 2026

Flank March - A Quick and Limited Review Part 1

Today I thought I'd do a quick, limited review of some 3D STLs I recently purchased from Flank March or downloaded for free from their store.

As some of you may be aware, I've been working on a bunch of HMMWVs for a while now.
One thing you've probably noticed is a disturbing lack of crew.  Well it at least disturbs me!

So I've been waiting for a while to find the right figures to field as late Cold War crew for my HMMWVs.  I've not been happy to what I could find previously, until Flank March added their REFROGER range to their growing collection after its successful Kickstarter.

I don't do Kickstarters, and I don't really need anymore American infantry, but what I do need are some of the rarer, odder things that fit around a core platoon that some manufacturers just don't do.  Flank March's fairly complete approach seems to have a few more of those niche items that I really need.  HMMWV crews were one of those things.

These crews are specifically for Bob Mack 3D designed HMMWVs.  I'm lucky enough to have a few of those, but I also have plenty more Revell and Dragon Hummers as well.  Hopefully they will still fit.... surely they will?

So I downloaded the crew and printed them.  I went with the .50 Cal, Mk-19 and TOW options.  There is a M-60 GPMG option as well which I may use in the future
Before I go any further I must add that the set from Flank March covers way more than just HMMWV crew.  You get figures for M1's, Bradleys, M113s, MUTTs and M60s.  Multiple variants for each vehicle, and as you can tell from the pic above, headless options as well.  

I choose to go with the headless options because the base option with heads in these cases were with M1 helmets and I wanted PASGT helmets.

As you can see these fit very nicely to this Revell HMMWV
 


Looking through the REFORGER collection I came across a bunch of head options you could pay for, but also a few free sample head options and a free figure.  I downloaded all of these and printed them off.
PASGT Heads

M1 Heads


A mix of heads

The free sample figure again allows you the option of printing it without a head.

Before I go any further I should also add that all the figures and options come in 15mm, 20mm and 28mm, supported and not supported.  I choose the easy option and used the 20mm supported files.  They all printed perfectly and were supported very well.  None of the barrels on the guns broke when removing them from the supports.

OK - so at this point I started picking which heads I wanted and gluing them to the neck sockets.




Very happy with how these turned out.

I also took a very quick and probably not well considered pick of the Flank March free sample figure alongside some other brands for a comparison shot.

Obviosuly not the best photo or even the best choice of comparison figures.  The Flank March figure is leaning quite far forward as he moves while most of the rest are quite upright.  Still it does make a reasonable comparison possible.  From Left to Right the figures are Elhiem (metal) Flank March (resin), Zvezda, Prieser (both hard plastic) and Revell (soft Plastic).

So my overall view of the Flank March products - the limited ones I bought or downlaoded for free - are very positive.  The puchase was pain free, the downloading simple and most importantly the printing was super easy with crisp results.

I'll do another review/results post once I've painted these all up.

My only negative and this is purely selfish of me, is that I would have loved some individual crew figures not "attached" to particular weapons systems.  Like a chap looking through binos, that you could use in any HMMWV turrets.  Or an individual TOW gunner that you could fit onto an already existing TOW system rather than having to print off and paint up a whole new one.  

But the figures are very clearly listed as being designed to fit into Bob Mack vehicles so I knew what I was getting into when I was buying them.

I think once the Flank March web site has all the pics uploaded for the REFORGER range - which I understand is going to happen shortly (if not already done) - then that will make shopping even easier.  I'm already eyeing off what I will purchase next!

So thanks if you made it to the end of these post.

Take care

Richard


29 September 2026

Making Kits

It's been a bit of a crap winter for me. Wet and miserable and I've been quite sick through most of it. On the mend now tho... So apart from working on some army lists, I've not really painted anything - just built a few kits - some of which I've had for quite a while and I just wanted to get them finally done.

Kits are all 1/72 and are as follows:


1 x Revell Leopard 1A5, plus a spare 1A5 turret I've attempted to turn into a 1A1A3 turret, using spare bits from and old Esci Leopard 1 and the hatch and hatch ring from the M48A2GA2 below. I need to add some 3D printed smoke dischargers once I've managed to print them.


2 x M48A2GA2. One the old original ESCI kit and one a rebadged Revell kit. For the Revell kit I used a spare old ESCI Leopard turret hatch and ring so I could have an open turret. As much as I love the look of these tanks - I kinda hate these kits!

3 x Revell Fuchs. Not much to say here really - but I thinkl I've showed one of these before - so just the two made so far this winter.


2 x S-Model Weisels, plus a couple of 3D printed Weisels. These will look much better once I've put some cam nets on them.


I love the pic of the M48A2GA2 sitting beside and above the Weisel. Pretty amazing size difference! How amazing is the Weisel. So much coolness in such a little package.
So hopefully I'll be painting and soon. I hope you're all managing to get stuff done as well.
Thanks everyone

Richard

07 September 2026

West German Heimatschutzbrigade 52, 53, 54 and 55, plus 60 Series Heimatschutzbrigades Battlegroup

Again, as promised, today I'm adding the newest army list for AirLand Battlegroup. This list covers the four 50 Series Heimatschutzbrigades (52, 53, 54 and 55) not covered in the previous list, the 60 Series Heimatschutzbrigades, units from the Heimatschutzregiments (Home Defence Security Regiments) and even a squad of Schutzpolizei. Fingers crossed this now completes set of 4 army lists for West Germany in the mid to late 1980s.


Here is the list:

West German 50 & 60 Series Heimatschutzbrigade plus Battlegroup

You will also be able to find the list in the NATO Army Lists TAB above.

As always I'd appreciate any feedback you're willing to give, especially if you find a factual error. I've done my best with researching these topics and trying to arranghe them sensibly but I'm sure there's the odd error or two.

That's the last list for a little while. Hopefully in a month or so I'll have enough info on the Finns and Swedes so they can get a list too!

Have fun!

Richard

03 September 2026

West German Heimatschutzbrigade 51 and 56 Battlegroup List

As I stated a couple of weeks ago in this post I recently started work on a Heimatschutzbrigade list.  Once I properly started to do some research it became clear that I would need to do two lists, if I wanted to do the subject justice and more importantly it would just make the whole project simpler.

So here is the first list

West German Heimatschutzbrigade 51 & 52 Battlegroups

You can also find it in the NATO Lists TAB above.

These two brigades are a little bit special.  Compared to the rest of the Heimatschutzbrigades, the Panzer Battalions in HSB 51 & 56 were equipped with Leopard 1's rather than M48s.  HSB 56 looks a lot more like a Panzergrenadier brigade than a territorial brigade.  It's two infantry battalions were equipped with Marders, it's artillery battalion had M109Gs, and it had a Panzerjager Company with Jaguar 2s.

As always, I'd be happy to recieve any feedback or any additional information to make these lists as accurate as I can within the bounds of the game.

The next list will cover the rest of the 50 Series Heimatschutzbrigades and all the 60 Series brigades.  Hopefully with this work done, it shouldn't take to long.

Once this is done I'll finally be moving onto the Finnish and Swedish lists.  I've already started work on the Finnish one, but need to do a lot more reading first.  In the meantime I need to work on some West German model kits so I'm ready to start a massive painting job this summer.  I'm also playing a bit of solo play of a very old hex and counter wargame to map out how Finland would go up against the Soviets for my timeline.

So that's it for now

Richard

 

29 August 2026

Quick Reference Sheet Update/Upgrade

A friend on the AirLand Battlegroup Facebook page noted a consistency error between the QRS and the Rulebook regarding the To Hit Table for ATGMs.  He also asked about the usage of NATO and Soviet nomenculture for Soviet ATGMs in the QRS - so I decided it was about time I updated it again.

The new QRS can be found here and in the Rules TAB above.

I've fixed the error and updated the names of the Soviet ATGMs.

As I was already there I also seriously updated the LAW, RPG, TRL, IRL, MAW, Recoilless Rifle and Automatic Grenade Launcher Table.  (A ridiculous name for a table I know!).  A few new weapon systems have been included and many penetration values and other things changed.  Sadly the WOMBAT is no longer the King of that particular table.

If you have any queries, let me know

Thanks

21 August 2026

Prototype AirLand Battlegroup Army List

OK – so here it is – my first prototype/sample army list to show what I’m thinking in terms of new lists for AirLand Battlegroup.  As I was just re-jigging the West German Panzer/Panzergrenadier Division Battlegroup list, I thought I may as well re-jig it yet again to show you want I mean.  You can have a look at it here.

Before you jump in and have a look here’s the comparison to the current lists which are of course based on the original Battlegroup rules for WW2:

FRONTLINE ASSETS

Forward HQ Units

Infantry Units

Tank Units

Artillery Units

Defences

SUPPORTING ASSETS

Reconnaissance Support Units

Engineer Support Units

Logistics Support Units

Specialist Support Units

Additional Fire Support


The new sample list has the following structure:

FRONTLINE ASSETS

Forward HQ Units

Infantry Units

Reconnaissance Units

Tank & Armoured Anti-tank Units

Defences

SUPPORTING ASSETS

Headquarters Support Units

Artillery Support Units

Aviation & Air Defence Support Units

Engineer Support Units

Combat Support Services Units

Additional Fire Support

So, first the obvious changes.  Recon units are now a frontline asset, while Artillery has been moved to supporting assets.  AFVs, that are not tanks, but are still armoured anti-tank vehicles are moved from the old specialist category into the tanks category.

Units from the Forward HQ that I considered to not be “frontline units” have been moved to a new category Headquarters Support units.  Artillery has been moved supporting assets.  While I see them as a fighting unit, they fight in support of other units – so they got moved.  I got rid of the Specialist category but added Aviation & Air Defence support units.  Looking through the current lists, the specialist category usually contained anti-tank and air defence units.  I’ve split them apart as it made more sense to me and represents a better way of showing the differences between WW2 and WW3!

Another new thing is that several of the support units allow choices from the Additional Fire Support option.

I guess the major change is that Recon units are now a first-choice option rather than just a support option.  I haven’t yet prepared a new Unit Availability Table and accompanying explanation but my thoughts that rather than just having an infantry unit as a must have option, you should be able to choose between either an infantry unit or a reconnaissance unit as your compulsory unit when constructing a list.

As I thought about the types of games I like to play and the battles I’ve read about (real and fictional) for some reason I quite enjoy the covering force where 2 recon forces clash.  I like playing on a pretty big table without necessarily having too much kit on the table at one time.  This works really well with games centred on recce forces.  Modern vehicles move really quickly too, so you don’t need too much stuff to be able to get around much of the table.  I wanted to be able to better represent those games – and so moved the Reconnaissance units from support into the Frontline.

One of the other major changes is the way off-table artillery is represented.  I’ll probably go into more detail in a later post, but again the changes are to represent something I like!  I like artillery systems, but they just shouldn’t be on the tabletop except under very specific purposes.  I can really only think of 1 artillery unit that should be on the table and that’s a 3 gun 2S1 battery that’s been attached to a forward detachment and is either sitting right at the back of the table or is undertaking a direct infantry gun type support role.  Even then the argument is a bit thinly stretched!

The new list pretty much allows you to buy barrages – rather than buying a battery of guns that blats away for you every turn.  This does make it a bit more like the additional fire support section of the list, but it is a lot more flexible – at least it will be for NATO forces.  The first 3 are pretty expensive, but still much cheaper than the current points value of buying the battery.  After that, any subsequent barrages are much cheaper.  Youi can of course buy other more specialist artillery rounds which again can be expensive.  These are limited in the game, so your platoon can’t be supported by a whole bunch of DPICM barrages every turn.

I want to create a system of displaying my off-table guns and the barrages I’ve paid for in a good looking but fun way – where I still get to display a model.  It will be an aide-memoir.  It just won’t be sitting on the actual table.  I have plans – but we’ll see how that turns out.

Finally, as I discussed on Facebook recently - I've included quite a lot of Speculative units/weapons systems into the list.  Based on the poll results - and it turned out to be a much easier option - they are spread out through out the list.  I've marked the speculative units in Red to make it easy to spot them for everyone and again it saves space doing it this way rather than having to write Speculative next to everything.

Anyway – that’s enough explanation for now.

I really-really need feedback on this.  So don’t hold back!

Thanks

Richard

16 August 2026

On this day 40 years ago. What if…..? Part 1

 40 years ago today, was Saturday 16 August 1986.  Looking back, in my alternate history it’s the day my alternate historians have labelled the start of World War Three.  But in many ways though, it’s really just one of many culmination points.  WW3 didn’t just happen, a switch wasn’t just flicked and we’re off.  It was more like a rolling series of incidents that when looked back upon seem to led inextricably to war.  At the time through, perhaps not so much.  Let's have a look at what might of happened in this first part on my alternate history.

What if . . . . Mikhail Gorbachev never became General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

What if . . . . In September 1984, Mikhail Gorbachev as chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee is heading back to Moscow after a trip to Sofia, Bulgaria, with his his wife, staffers and other Soviet dignitaries.  Suddenly there is an explosion and the plane crashes to the ground in Ukraine.  Ironically, the military and state security delegates had been meant to fly back with Gorbachev were held up in meetings with their Bulgarian counterparts and were unable to make the flight.

What if . . . . In the aftermath of the tragedy, KGB and the Bulgarian DS (Secret Police) quickly arrest 2 Bulgarian dissidents and a Polish émigré who had been working at the Vrazhdebna airport and are charged with somehow managing to smuggle an explosive device on to Gorbachev’s flight.

What if . . . . In late October 1984, the Soviet Minister of Foreign Affairs provides the world’s media with (grainy) photographic evidence of the Pole and one of the Bulgarian dissidents meeting with a Finnish diplomat in Sofia.  The Minister claims the “diplomat” is actually from Supo, the Finnish Security and Intelligence Service.

What if . . . . The Kremlin actively blame the Government of Finland and the Polish Solidarity union movement for the death of their dear friend, Comrade Gorbachev and the other Soviet delegates.

What if . . . . Early November 1984 the Soviet Politburo demands that the “Pro-NATO, Nazi Government in Helsinki” immediately resign and the new elections are held, supervised by officials of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.  They also demand that all Supo staff be suspended pending investigation and that the KGB be allowed to carry out that investigation.  The Kremlin also announces that all Finnish-Soviet military cooperation, contracts, trade and services will be put on hold until Finland has complied with the Soviet requests.

What if . . . . At the same time, the Soviet leadership demand the Polish Government immediately disband Solidarity and arrest Lech Walesa and the rest his hated activists.  If this is not done post haste by the Poles, the Soviet army will become involved.

What if . . . . The Finns deny any involvement in the tragedy and reject entirely all Soviet demands.  The Finnish Prime Minister calls for an independent UN led investigation into the incident and pledges complete transparency with such an inquiry.

 What if . . . . Mid November 1984, the Polish Government stumble into action and attempt to crush Solidarity once and for all.  Thousands are arrested over the next few weeks, but not Lech Walesa or any of the union’s key members who have all gone underground.  Massive strikes start to roll across Poland and the country’s economy rapidly begins to grind to a halt.  In a bid to save his own government and stay in power, Wojciech Jaruzelski, Poland’s Chairman of the Council of State invites the KGB to assist Poland’s SB (Security Service) in finding and arresting Solidarity’s leadership.


What if . . . . From November 1984 onwards, Finnish businesses within the Soviet Union begin to be systematically boycotted, vandalised and even fire bombed. Owners are attacked and arrested as “Agents of the West”.  KGB Border troops start making crossing into Finland increasingly difficult short of closing the actual border.

What if . . . . In the lead up to Christmas 1984 on at least two occasions, Finnish citizens, trying to return from the Soviet Union to Finland are shot attempting to cross the border. 

What if . . . . On New Years Day 1985, the Soviet Embassy in Helsinki is surrounded by massed protests which appear to be settling in for a long stay.  Several other Soviet related entities in Helsinki, such as the Soviet Institute and the HQ of the Finland-Soviet Society are also closed due to protests.  The Helsinki Government calls for calm.

What if . . . . at midnight on 12 January 1985 shots appear to be fired into crowd from the Soviet Embassy which had remained effectively under siege.  While the crowd disperses from around the Embassy the Soviet Institute and the Finland-Soviet Society’s premises are extensively damaged by fire.

What if . . . . on 13 January 1985, the Finnish Government recalls its Ambassador from Moscow.  The families  of diplomatic staff also leave the Soviet capital while those Finnish staff that remain prepare to close the Embassy.  Meanwhile the Kremlin declares all Finnish embassy staff to be persona non-grata and gives them 48hrs to leave the country.

What if . . . . on 16 January 1985 shots are exchanged between KGB and Finnish border guards.  Both governments announce the next day that all border crossings between Finland and the Soviet Union closed.  In response to the Kremlin’s diplomatic decisions the Finnish Government requests all Soviet Embassy staff and associates leave the country immediately. 

What if . . . . Early February 1985 during a clear night, a Soviet Baltic Fleet Kotlin-class Destroyer “Spokoyny” collides with and sinks a Finnish Navy Turunmaa-class Corvette “Karjala” in international waters.  27 Finnish crew members are lost and the Spokoyny does not render assistance.  Swedish and Finnish Navy assets manage to rescue the surviving crew.  The next morning  Soviet fighters from the PVO Baltic Air Defgnce District shot down a Finnish Air Force DKF/35FS Draken fighter which they said and flown into Soviet Airspace and “locked-up” a civilian Aeroflot airliner preparing to land in St Petersburg.  Interestingly the Draken wreckage was found by the Police near Vaalimaa, Finland, several kilometres within Finnish border.

What if . . . . Mid February, frustrated by the lack of progress by the KGB and SB to arrest Solidarity’s leadership, Moscow announces the activation of the Soviet Northern Group of Forces.  The annoucement states that this is being done “to help our fraternal Polish brothers deal with these CIA funded terrorists” and to finally stop the nation-wide industrial action.

What if . . . . On the death of Konstantin Chernenko in March 1985, Yegor Ligachev is elected General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.  Previously Secretary for Ideology, Chernenko was thought to be somewhat of an ally of Gorbachev.  Now as Chairman he retains Andrei Gromyko as Foreign Minister, Dmitry Ustinov as Defence Minister, Viktor Chebrikov as KGB Chairman and Vitaly Fedorchik as Interior Minister.  All well-known anti-Western conservatives.

What if . . . . In May 1985 the new leadership team of the Kremlin, know in the West as the “Triumvirate of Five” announce that their patience with the pro-Western Nazi Government in Helsinki is running out.  In addition to the original demands, Moscow now demands that under the terms of the Agreement of Friendship, Cooperation, and Mutual Assistance, Finland now must also submit to KGB official investigating every Government Department and Agency to root all anti-Soviet pro-Western agents in every Finnish Government department and agency.  They also demand that, the Soviet Armed Forces undertake a similar investigation in the Finnish Army, Navy and Air Force for the mutual benefit of Finland and the Soviet Union.  Soviet “advisors” must be present beside all Finish military leadership positions.  Finally, huge financial and territorial reparations similar in scope to those paid after the end of the Second World War are called for.

 What if . . . . Once again Finns deny any involvement in the tragedy and again reject all Soviet statements as baseless.  In a televised speech, the Finnish President states that Moscow, for some reason that only they can know, seem intent on punishing Finland and seek to destroy the Finns national sovereignty – something that the Soviet Union had committed to uphold since 1945.  He reiterates Finland’s neutrality and desire to live in peace with the neighbour and until recently, Soviet friends.  He states that Finland never would and never will initiate offensive action against another country but will actively defend every inch of it’s territory.  At the end of his speech The Finnish President mobilises the reserves of the Defence Forces and announces  for an independent UN led investigation into the incident and pledges complete transparency with such an inquiry.


That's it for Part 1.  To be continued...

Thanks for looking

Richard