Hi all. I've not been that well lately, so have not been as active as I would have liked, especially with regard to doing stuff worthy of being posted here.
I have however, recently come across "Blue Stuff".
Hi all. I've not been that well lately, so have not been as active as I would have liked, especially with regard to doing stuff worthy of being posted here.
I have however, recently come across "Blue Stuff".
So things are starting to settle down and weather is slowly warming up. This has meant I've finally been able to set up my 3D Printer for the first time in almost 2 years. Turns out the hardest thing was deciding what to make to test out the printer. I was wondering whether it was still working after all that time, inaction, storage and a sea voyage. I choose to reprint a couple of Canadian Lynx's, as I need 4 for my new recon project. Here they are:
Very happy with how these turned out. I just need to replace the barrel of the .50 Cal to something a little more in scale and they will be ready for stowage. I might also drill out the rear hatch on the one with the open cupola, so I can show it crewed there as well. I also have to find some .30 Cals I bought for this purpose ages ago, so they are properly armed.Sorry it's been a while, but you wouldn't know it - I've actually played a couple of games for the first time in over 2 years! Both were "introductory" Battlegroup WWII games so I won't be posting up any pics, but it was great to do a bit of painting, put the new table to the test, roll some dice and meet some new guys here in NZ. New to me that is.
Before the games, and as I was sorting out stuff to put away into the display cabinet a lined up a few things to take some group photos. First up was my Soviets:
Still a few things to do here, and this doesn't include any unmade kits in the "stash".
Next up were the Brits:
Then the Americans:
Getting smaller and smaller. Lastly the West Germans:
This really didn't seem like much in the West German department and I was scratching my head for a while as I put these in the cabinet - and went searching until I found all the missing vehicles. No photo of them I'm afraid.
So that's the majority of my larger Cold War armies. All in 20mm of course. Still loads of work to do to finish them off. Any questions, just let me know
Thanks
Richard
So - lots of good news on the Games Room front. Firstly, and somewhat most importantly from the whole "Games Room" point-of-view, I now have a 10 ft x 6 ft table top. Beautifully crafted by my Games Room go-to-guy, Lawrence, it fits perfectly on top of all my smaller storage cupboards. Here it is in possibly not the greatest angle:
No - not a rude phrase in German (at least not this time), this is a basic descriptor of how I have been keeping myself busy on some of the colder days we've had recently. Consigned to one half of the house - the bit with the fire - I decided it was time to start my next project - some more German recon units.
Just as an opener, I've got to say the 1/72 Revell Luchs Spahpanzer 2 is a beauty of a kit. At the same time, it's pretty easy to do your head in with the whole suspension. Looky here:
It's been very cold lately, so any desire to go into my freezing garage and take pics has been easily squashed. Today wasn't so bad, and I had found all the bits for this little Rapier SAM Troop, so I decided to give it a go.
Here is the Rapier in action:
This is an S&S Models Rapier SAM. S&S can provide you with an entire troop, emplaced or in the open (like this one), including all the vehicles etc. Here I have used the launcher (with 4 missiles as per the 1980s) which comes with a small generator and the Blindfire Radar - which also comes with its own generator. I have both of mine in the deployed position, but you could easily have them made up to look like they are being towed.
Here's a couple of close-ups, along with the vehicle that would have towed them:
The crewed optical tracker and the chaps saying look over there! both come from Armybits and were provided to me, very kindly, by Keith Armstrong, the designer. I fiddled with them to convert them from 15mm to 20mm, which was a bit of fun. Here's a couple of close-ups of them:
So I misspoke. No new army list or miniature photos today - although I have been busy working in the garage/games room.
Now I have carpeted an area in the middle of the room.
And then moved the smaller cabinets which will form the foundation for the table top and handy storage areas, to the spot where they will sit.
Hi everyone. In FAQ Part 2, rather than providing all the questions and responses, like I did in Part 1, I've decided to simply list the topics and then provide the like to the pdf. This is also available on the FAQ Tab at the top of the page.
The topics discussed are:
So just a quick update today - to show I've finally made some progress in the creation of my games room. From this
These are my new cabinets along one wall of the garage – our old TV will go in the centre – only about 4 days work off and on
putting them together. They each weigh about 45 kilos! 2 are for
“The Stash” – the rest is bits and pieces – no terrain – that’ll go in smaller
cabinets to fit under the table.
Second half of the FAQ coming soon
Richard
Here is Part 1 of my current F.A.Q. document. It deals specifically with rules questions in no particular order. Part 2 will deal with more philosophical style - what were you thinking - type questions. My answers are in red.
I'll add these as a .pdf document into the FAQ tab at the top of the page once it is combined.
Thanks
Richard
AIRCRAFT
We pulled an aircraft chit for the Russians and
rolled up a Su-25 Frogfoot with 2 AAMs with a Gatling Heavy Autocannon (Tankbuster)
– No.6 on the chart. We could not find
any penetration values for that weapon or even any for NATO. Do we use the weapons off the AFV list? We got the part about upping the penetration
table by 4 lines!
Yes, use the weapons off the AFV charts - in this
case the 30mm 2A42. Most NATO planes should have the equivalent of the 20mm
Vulcan Gatling Gun. The A-10 should use the 30mm RARDEN stats.
I’m really not sure I have such an issue with this to be honest. If an AFV manages to get hit by pretty much anything
delivered by an aircraft, I can’t see much of a chance of it surviving. However, jet aircraft appearing on the table
should be relatively rare and not be game killers, as they typically attack one
thing before flying off again.
ATGM
We have
allowed ATGM's to fire using the Ambush Fire order. Is that correct? If so, can they attempt to fire again on
Ambush fire if they failed to spot the first time?
I have no issue with a ATGM using the Ambush Fire
order. However, they only get one chance
to spot as the "Shoot & Track" order takes up two activations. If you don't observe the target – sadly you Ambush
Fire order is wasted.
Reloading ATGM vehicles. A non-specialist vehicle like the BMP is a 1/1. Having fired an ATGM on turn 1, we assumed it has to spend turn 2 reloading, before it can fire again in turn 3.
A specialist vehicle like the FV438 is a 2/5.
Having fired in turns 1 and 2, we assumed it has to spend turn 3 reloading,
before it can fire again in turns 4 and 5.
The questions are;
1) were we right it takes a turn to reload?
2) does it take a reload order or is it assumed
the vehicle will reload using their own initiative?
3) we didn't use man packed ATGMs, but we assume
once they have fired their ready ammo (3 shots) they can be reloaded from their
transport vehicle - does this need a resupply order?
1) Under the new rule “Vehicle mounted ATGMs – Missile Ammunition” all vehicles
mounting ATGMs take one turn, where they must remain stationary, to
reload. This does not apply to tabks
that are capable of firing ATGMs or vehicles that have the “Fast Re-loader”
vehicle trait.
2) In this case there is no “Reload” order. In fact, the stationary vehicle cannot be
given orders or activated. It is just
assumed that the crew knows what it's doing and is concentrating on reloading
as quickly as it can.
3) Regarding man-packed ATGM you'll note the restricted ammo rule currently is
an optional rule. The rule states that the team can be re-supplied from their
attached (or parent) vehicle or if they don't have one - from a standard
re-supply vehicle. Both these options use the standard resupply rules.
The BRDM-2/Sagger have an ammo rating of 6/1, this means it
has 6 missiles ready to fire and when it has fired all of them, it can then reload
all 6 missiles once in the game?
Yes that is correct
Just one missile per Shoot & Track
order - so one missile per turn. Assuming your BRDM-2/AT-3 doesn't want to move
and has a target every turn it could sit there had shoot every turn for 6
turns.
Question about ATGMs with tandem warheads. The rules state that it ignores composite armour and ERA. I thought tandem charges were designed do defeat ERA only? The addition of a small initial explosive charge shouldn’t really affect the main HEAT charge's penetration vs composite armour should it?
Under Tandem Warheads in the ATGM section it states
laminate and/or ERA. However, in the
next sentence I state “AFVs with the Advanced Armour trait do not get to add
1D6 to their armour value against hits by missiles with tandem warheads”. This is incorrect – it should read “AFVs with
the Reactive Armour
trait do not get to add 1D6 to their armour value against hits by missiles with
tandem warheads”.
Can passengers in an IFV, disembark at the same time as the IFV is using the “Shoot & Track - ATGM” order?
No it cannot. An IFV could fire its main gun
and disembark, or move and disembark, but Shoot & Track ATGM is a double
activation order and it's pretty clear that whatever is firing and tracking the
ATGM, be it vehicle or an infantry ATGM team, can do nothing else that turn.
LIGHT ANTI-TANK WEAPONS
Are LAWs one use only? I know in real life they are and there is a
brief descriptive mention that they are in the rules but we didn't notice a
concrete ruling on it and we had a few thoughts - either they're unlimited use,
representing the extras that may have been carried in transports or lugged
around by other members of the section - or that they are realistic and single
use, in which case we thought that they may be quite expensive in comparison to
other NATO/Pact options such as PzF's/RPGs, etc. What is the actual rule on this? Cause we
could see it going either way.
LAWs are like Panzerfausts in standard
Battlegroup. Definitely one use only.
Options: May take a M72A2 LAW + 5 pts. Does this mean I can take only one LAW or
their number in a squad is not limited?
May take one only for +5 points
Not found in the Rules description,
where can I find the mechanics of fire for a M72A2 LAW, AT 4 LAW, RPG or
grenade launcher etc)?
Use "Area Fire - with small arms,
machine guns & High Explosive Shells" from the Battlegroup main rule
book or "Aimed Fire - with small arms and machineguns" from the Cold
War variant rule book. The small arms and other weapons 'To Hit' table on page
8 and the LAW, RPG, MAW, Recoilless Rifle and Automatic Grenade Launcher Table
on Page 9, along with the commentary below it should help. There is also
information on Page 21 about all of those weapons, but in the next update I need
to change some of the information in the little call out boxes which is no
longer correct.
TANKS
I have a M60A1 RISE/PASSIVE. It has the following weapons: 105mm L68A1 – Turret, MG - Co-axial, HMG – Turret.
How many shots to infantry can be made from HMG – Turret? RoF 6
2) I want to fire on enemy infantry. Do I understand correctly that I can only fire from 105mm L68A1 or from MG. That's the way I've always played it
3) The tank has a MG and HMG. Can I fire them at the same time, i.e. throw 3 dice per MG and plus 6 for the HMG? I've always played it that you can't. You must choose one or the other. However, I could swear I’ve seen some commentary on Facebook commentary where it indicated it was possible to fire two MGs at a target. I’ll keep looking and come back with a more definitive yes/no.
ARTILLERY
Can I ask what the reasoning is for not including the BM-21
as on table artillery? Simply because their engagement range would put them as
far away from the front at possible? I have seen them included in some other
lists.
If you look at the Soviet lists all of them (except
Soviet Naval Infantry) have had the BM-21s and a number of other high level
artillery assets removed from the artillery section of the list and can now be
found only in the additional fire support section. This means they are all now
off-table.
I've left the BM-21 in the SNI list as it was found Regimental rather than
divisional level. The SNI had no 2S1 batteries. Still, I'm sure it could be
easily argued that even here they should really just be off table assets.
HELICOPTERS
A small mistake (?) in the capacity of NATO helicopters. Two Rifle
Squads U.S. Marines 26 men, helicopters capacity of 24. Two man left at the
base?
The two CH-46E are purchased for the Platoon. The Platoon has 42 men in
it. Together the helicopters can carry 48 men. One squad can be split using the
fireteam rule. The helo carrying the Platoon Command Squad and 1 Rifle Squad
has space for up to 8 men.
Can I put the Forward
Headquarters on the helicopter?
Can't see any reason why not. Using the USMC as an
example - there is space in the CH-46Es for the Forward HQ. However, if you buy
a bunch of Platoon Support options and you want to also helo-transport them,
I'd just add another helicopter for 25 pts +2-r BR. That should work. Just work
on what you and your opponent are happy with.
Recently a reader asked if I had a list of Frequently Asked Questions. Of course I don't! However I aim to change that as of today. I have created a new page (at the top of the blog) where anyone can come in and ask questions about my very unofficial Battlegroup Cold War variant. Please feel free to use it.
I also have access to the old forum where my variant was openly discussed before PSC released NORTHAG. I'll scroll through those threads and pull out any useful questions and put them into a pdf document and post it under the FAQ page.
Hope that is considered helpful.
Richard
I'm pretty sure this is a first for me - a blog post about a museum visit. I'll be sticking to cold war aircraft only though.
Soon after we arrived in New Zealand we had to go to Christchurch to pick up our dog, who had travelled over separately a week or so after we had left. A long story as to why that was the case. Anyhow, we decided to stay in Ashburton, a small town to the South of Christchurch, and I ended up having a couple of hours to kill so I headed off to the Ashburton Aviation Museum. I knew this existed from a previous stay, and looking at the brochure, it looked like they had managed to acquire a Harrier GR.3, so my incentive to go immediately tripled.
RNZAF Station Ashburton was a pilot basic training base during WW2. Today it is still used as a civilian aerodrome and its a great spot for a small NZ aviation museum.
I had a very pleasant visit, chatted to a couple of lovely elderly chaps who knew way more about planes in general and aviation in NZ then I could learn in several lifetimes and took loads of photos. So here are a few of the said RAF Harrier GR.3: